Log in

No account? Create an account

Tell me again, why do I need one of these things?

More Meta, Not Mine, Who Sexuality (again)

More Meta, Not Mine, Who Sexuality (again)

Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
hugh house
Okay, over on ars_divina the lovely ruggedly handsome issi_noho pointed me to an alternative construction of the Doctor's sexuality, which is only mildly spoilerific for the American audience:

No Sex, Please, We're Gallifreyan
  • I'd prefer to be described as 'ruggedly handsome'.
  • Thanks for the link to the article! Interesting!

    Not spoiled because I already saw the kiss on someone's vid. I hadn't seen Dr. Who since the Fifth Doctor regenerated as the Sixth--and then American TV didn't get any more Who for a year or more and I lost track. And yes, I know that was about twenty years ago. Don't remind me. :)

    Anyway, so I recently saw this new Who. And I was cheering! It's great. It's what they probably wished it to be back when the state of British TV production was...ick.
    • That you didn't see anything after the fifth doesn't surprise me, that was when the show started hitting serious production problems and even got taken off air for a year.

      It's very shiny, isn't it?
Powered by LiveJournal.com